Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Lockstep

"They are walking in lockstep."

I've heard pundits and politicians use the word "lockstep" countless times.  It's most common context seems to be contributing to accusations that the opponents do not think for themselves and are all just lemmings that do what their told. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Auburn_lockstep.gif
Having hear "lockstep" used so many times, I wondered what the original context for the word was, because clearly it is used in a metaphorical or idiomatic way by political pontificators.  Turns out, the word comes from the lives of American prisoners who were forced to walk in lockstep by guards.  "Lockstep" referred to the coordinated marching of prisoners, who were often chained together at the ankle.  They had to synchronize their steps because they were forced to walk extremely close to the prisoners in front and behind.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockstep

Do politicians really know what the implications of referring to people as in "lockstep"?  Are they intentionally comparing their opponents to prisoners forced to just fall in line?  I'm not sure they really care.  Attacking the character and independence of opponents is hypocritical and a reflection of the accuser's weakness.  Why can't more pundits have a discussion without the name calling and give the American population the pleasure of real, substantive debate? 

Lockstep?  If you're accusing the other party of lockstep, you might consider looking how you're own feet are tied to the hypocrites in front of and behind you.

No comments:

Post a Comment